Articles - News

   In response to market demand for vacation experiences which promote healthy lifestyles, the town of Soufrière in Saint Lucia will welcome a brand new health and wellness retreat in the Fall.

Senator Allen Chastanet, Saint Lucia’s Minister of Tourism and Civil Aviation, announced plans for the first health and wellness retreat in the charming former French capital of Soufrière from November 17 to 20, 2011.

The retreat will feature workshops and wellness experiences, featuring some of the world’s foremost experts in yoga, feng shui, art and cuisine in a community which Senator Chastanet describes as “The Eden of the Caribbean.”

The retreat is being launched alongside preparations to build a landmark destination spa at Soufrière’s drive-in volcano which offers visitors therapeutic mineral baths. “Soufrière was chosen in part because of the number of world class spas in the town, and we are pleased that our hotels and resorts are on board for the retreat,” reported Senator Chastanet.

The health and wellness retreat will promote a wide variety of approaches to enhance healthy minds and healthy bodies through nature trail hikes, bicycle rides and other specially-designed experiences.

“Soufrière is natural, authentic and exotic and we could not think of a better destination within Saint Lucia to produce this retreat,” posited Senator Chastanet.

The health and wellness retreat is being produced by the Soufrière Foundation in partnership with Soufrière’s resort community and in concert with the Saint Lucia Tourist Board.

   The incident involving a police officer, a private citizen and a government minister’s private vehicle which occurred on Jeremie Street last week Friday is not going away, at least not for the next few days as more fingers are pointed and more persons get involved.
Gregory ‘Smoking Joe’ Joseph, the man who police say assaulted one of their own who was in the process of placing a traffic ticket on the vehicle of Housing Minister Richard Frederick, which police say was illegally parked on Jeremie Street and who was arrested and released that same day was re-arrested Thursday.
The controversy surrounding his release has grown and continues to grow and could very well engulf the Minister more than he anticipated as word reaching The VOICE is that two citizens are reviewing the comments he made about them on his Radio 100 talk show yesterday morning.
Meanwhile a letter dated 5th July written by the Minister to the Commissioner of Police Vernon Francois as a formal complaint against the traffic officer who wrote the ticket has attracted the attention of at least one political party which stated that the revelations contained in the letter should be of great concern to the Commissioner as well as the general public.
Minister Frederick, in his letter notes that he is being deliberately targeted by the officer.
According to the Minister it first started when, a few months ago, Pearlina Faucher, his common law wife was stopped by the same officer whilst driving one of his motor vehicles Registration No. 7700 and that having stopped her, he told her his reason for stopping her is because he thinks that he had seen this number on another vehicle.
The Minister then wrote about another incident, about six weeks ago, according to him in where he was parked on Chisel Street next to his building, that day being a Friday, his constituency day. He noted that on that particular Friday the same officer issued a ticket to him notwithstanding the officer being told by one Kendal Adonis that he (Frederick) was permitted to park there because, according to the Minister he has an extremely good relationship with the store operators there.
.... Local News


09th July 2011
Minister Writes Letter to Police Commissioner
M.G. George

The incident involving a police officer, a private citizen and a government minister’s private vehicle which occurred on Jeremie Street last week Friday is not going away, at least not for the next few days as more fingers are pointed and more persons get involved.
Gregory ‘Smoking Joe’ Joseph, the man who police say assaulted one of their own who was in the process of placing a traffic ticket on the vehicle of Housing Minister Richard Frederick, which police say was illegally parked on Jeremie Street and who was arrested and released that same day was re-arrested Thursday.
The controversy surrounding his release has grown and continues to grow and could very well engulf the Minister more than he anticipated as word reaching The VOICE is that two citizens are reviewing the comments he made about them on his Radio 100 talk show yesterday morning.
Meanwhile a letter dated 5th July written by the Minister to the Commissioner of Police Vernon Francois as a formal complaint against the traffic officer who wrote the ticket has attracted the attention of at least one political party which stated that the revelations contained in the letter should be of great concern to the Commissioner as well as the general public.
Minister Frederick, in his letter notes that he is being deliberately targeted by the officer.
According to the Minister it first started when, a few months ago, Pearlina Faucher, his common law wife was stopped by the same officer whilst driving one of his motor vehicles Registration No. 7700 and that having stopped her, he told her his reason for stopping her is because he thinks that he had seen this number on another vehicle.
The Minister then wrote about another incident, about six weeks ago, according to him in where he was parked on Chisel Street next to his building, that day being a Friday, his constituency day. He noted that on that particular Friday the same officer issued a ticket to him notwithstanding the officer being told by one Kendal Adonis that he (Frederick) was permitted to park there because, according to the Minister he has an extremely good relationship with the store operators there.




“All of this culminated in what transpired on Friday 1st July, 2011. I was indeed parked along Jeremie Street and was one among a number of vehicles parked there nearing twenty. They were parked on both sides of the road which is devoid of double yellow lines. I had been there for no more than a few minutes and in fact, had to ‘make a round’ before I got to park,” Frederick wrote in his letter.
“There were vehicles in front and behind me. The officer passed every vehicle, stood up to the front of my vehicle at an open stance, fixed his shades and proceeded to write the ticket. Angel Brouet’s vehicle was parked there and was surpassed when he came to mine to get the attention of the extremely large crowd socializing along the street. All one needs to write a ticket is the vehicle’s number. But his stance in front of the vehicle with a conspicuous sticker to the front, which by itself was already attracting attention given the fact that it referred to the Leader of the Opposition was clearly an intention to “show off authority”, “ Frederick wrote.
The Minister added that when he puts those incidents together they cannot be coincidental but clearly an intention to embarrass or target him and that he had made and continues to make conscious efforts to avoid interference with the police in the execution of their duties.
“I have every respect for all law enforcement officers but cannot permit myself or office to be used as an instrument of enforcement demonstration without total justification,” the Minister wrote.
But even as the Minister called for an investigation into the matter the Labour Party is taking him to task for claiming he had not witnessed the incident between the officer and Joseph. According to a Labour party release the Minister cannot be believed based on detailed accounts contained in his own letter.
The Labour Party has since called on the Minister to explain why he followed in such detail the actions of the traffic officer leading to the writing of the ticket but denies viewing the altercation with Joseph which started while the ticket was being written and which continued after it was placed on the Minister’s vehicle.
“The SLP believes that it is reasonable to conclude that Mr. Frederick, as a lawmaker, could have intervened to restrain his political associate, “Smoking Joe”, but chose not to.” The SLP statement noted.

   Even though I had once been the paper’s editor, I am seldom featured in the Voice. Nevertheless, and despite the political circumstances that led to my reluctant departure, I remain ever grateful to Sir Garnet Gordon and his son Michael for affording me so many years ago what I considered my dream opportunity to do on home ground what I love best, and had done for some three decades in frigid Britain and in the United States. Saint Lucia was then five years from Independence, but already John Compton was a numinous figure, as much loved as feared by most of his people. How reckless of me, then, to have crossed him almost from the moment I set foot on the Rock of Sages.
The island was at that time served by two other newspapers: George Odlum’s take-no-prisoners Crusader and the barely there Herald. While the Voice was regularly published on Wednesdays and Saturdays, the others were weekend affairs. The Voice and the Herald were considered UWP organs, at any rate by the “communist” Odlum and his growing following of soi-disant progressives. But I soon discovered that when it came to the local press the nation’s soon-to-be prime minister was an equal-opportunity despiser and would not have minded one bit if he woke up one morning to the news that the tryptich had gone up in smoke during the night. Like another prime minister I need not name, John Compton was never a lover of the so-called Fourth Estate, not even when its representatives resided in his back pocket.
As I say, I had been at the Voice less than a year when two of Compton’s ministers were pushed to resign following Voice revelations that carried my by-line. But if I anticipated congratulations from my employers on a job well done, I soon was brought down to earth with a hip-busting jolt. Sir Garnet’s words will for as long as I live stay with me: “You may be a wonderful journalist but what you write in my newspaper is interfering with my life style.” I resigned, knowing full well my days at the Voice were numbered, that I would never be the kind of journalist my employer had in mind when he hired me as his editor. How ironic that when barely six weeks after I decided to spare Sir Garnet further embarrassment John Compton invited me to put my shoulder where my mouth was and become his personal assistant. But then this especially important episode about my formative years as a journalist working in Saint Lucia is detailed in my book It’ll Be All Right In the Morning. No need to go deeper into it here. Suffice it to say I’ve paid my dues and know well the wildlife of our political jungle!
Although I count Michael Gordon among our nation’s more respectable sons, I suspect his newspaper tends to publish only what it considers most demeaning of me. Put it down to friendly competition, if you will. While as a matter of policy I will not feature in the STAR comments critical of Voice articles, it seems the competition operates by different rules. Still I was taken aback upon learning about a recent Voice item that seemed to say I had written in the STAR what I was certain I had not. The purported proof of my faux pas appeared in the Voice under the bold headline: Rick Wayne admits that the multi-million-dollar Daher building is derelict.
My initial reaction was: I did? So what’s newsworthy about that? But as I read on it occurred to me that in this being the season for silliness the SLP’s hyenas were not so much interested in news per se as in somehow profiting by the notion that for once I had confirmed a party position. But then, typically, they wanted also to have their cake and eat it. It was not enough simply to bask in their imagined sunshine. The Saint Lucia Labour Party also felt an irresistible need to publicly express concern “over the misrepresentation of its position on the King government’s Daher Mall fiasco by the STAR publisher.” They could’ve sent their complaint to the ostensible offender but chose not to. On the presumed basis that Voice readers read no other newspaper, the concerned defenders of the SLP’s good name reproduced a paragraph from my original STAR story, at the heart of which was an appeal to the prime minister and his wannabe replacement to say before the upcoming elections how they planned to improve the nation’s economic plight, in particular, the private sector’s recession-related predicament.
The folks at the Voice were not about to look a gift horse in the mouth. So what if the grinning guardians of SLP guile had themselves misrepresented the message of my article: “Three years ago, after the prime minister, under heavy opposition duress, delivered to angry and threatening public servants money that was obviously not readily available, the prime minister revealed there was just two million dollars left in the public kitty. The announcement was generally received by the helplessly schadenfreude crowd as a joke at the prime minister’s expense—as if indeed he had just declared personal bankruptcy. It didn’t stop there: the opposition insisted that more money be spent bringing the derelict Daher Building up to scratch, since the government had, wisely or unwisely, purchased it. As if there was even the smallest chance two wrongs might for once add up to right.”
It seemed my critics’ main purpose was to reassure Voice readers: “The SLP rejects outright the suggestion in the above statement that the party has ever supported the Daher Mall project. The SLP has been consistent in its condemnation of this deal, which has cost taxpayers $27 million for repairs and completion works. The Labour Party warned from the onset that the purchase should not have been undertaken and predicted the enormous cost of rehabilitation. In addition, the Labour Party has called on the King government to provide evidence of the structural integrity of the building to which no answer has been given up to this day.”
Well-constructed news report or party press release? Poor Garnet Gordon must be tossing in his grave. In life he never would’ve imagined his precious Voice as a shameless disseminator of SLP propaganda. But then, what a nightmare also for George Odlum that the parasites that had sucked the life out of him and then abandoned his carcass without so much as a final good word are the current beneficiaries of “the people’s newspaper!”
I still have not discovered where in my article I suggested the SLP had ever supported a government initiative, let alone the heavily-baggaged Daher Mall project. What did I say in my article about the private sector that differs from the SLP’s restated position on the Daher Building? Might the problem center on a misunderstanding of the word “derelict” as it appears in my article, wherein it refers to a deserted building and not to such building’s structural integrity? Admittedly, derelict can also refer to a building in poor condition due to neglect and disuse. Or even to a live person without a home, a job or property. It all depends on context. On the other hand, derelict—as used in the SLP’s “Rick Wayne admits that the multi-million-dollar Daher building is derelict”—is synonymous with delinquent, neglectful, remiss. So go figure, dear reader.
Perhaps it was this section of what I wrote that most bothered the SLP: “It didn’t stop there: the opposition insisted that more money be spent bringing the derelict Daher Building up to scratch, since the government had, wisely or unwisely, purchased it.” But if the SLP’s watchdogs again acknowledge that they had always considered the purchase unwise, how then have I misrepresented them? Puhleeze!
Especially during the most recent relocation of the external affairs ministry, the Labour Party’s lunchtime UFOs were spewing from all orifices about how the government should more usefully have repaired the Daher Building and accommodated external affairs, in fulfillment of Sir John’s intention revealed during his final budget address. Were the recommended repairs to be undertaken without spending more dollars! Or have I also got that wrong? Maybe the SLP’s experts were suggesting the government should have allowed the building to crumble and fall and the hell with the millions paid for it.
I am almost tempted to say a refurbished Daher Building and its surroundings will be a fine government-owned asset, in the long run likely to save taxpayers millions of dollars in office rent. But then I would be echoing the calculated sentiments of shameless red eyes: “So what if Rochamel was a multi-million-dollar fiasco? We have a hotel!” More self delusion, of course, since even they must know by now it is Butch Stewart who owns the Sandals Grande; not the people of Saint Lucia. In any event, Sir Ramsahoye made that clear enough even for eyes that will not see!
For the record, it was Sir John who first announced in parliament the purchase of the Daher Building for the purpose of housing government offices, including the external affairs ministry—not Stephenson King, who was then only the Minister of Health. Which is not to say King did not inherit responsibility for the property. But let us understand it was a done deal by the time King replaced the deceased Compton. He had little choice but to make the best of it. I am here reminded that back in the day, believe it or not, the Labour Party had protested most vehemently the development of Rodney Bay by a John Compton administration. To an even greater extent, incredibly, the SLP had resisted Independence. Ah, but don’t count on hearing from them today a disparaging word about the Marina, the malls and the several other amenities that have turned a once upon a time mosquito-infested swamp into the pumping heart of our island’s tourism industry. Don’t expect to hear Kenny Anthony say Independence is an evil notion, whether or not under John Compton!
As for the Daher Building episode, Hansard contains no contrary word from the House opposition. Perhaps (permit the stretch) the leader of the opposition was even so concerned about Sir John’s health as to spare him pressure? And another thing: When I write about the opposition, I do not always refer to members of parliament. Quite often I am referring to opponents of an idea, whether proffered by the government or by the Saint Lucia Labour Party. Again: context, context, context. But then it is not all that difficult to see why the SLP always imagines the song is about them. Yes, vanity may have something to do with it. But I strongly suspect the real problem centers on paranoia. After all, well known is the SLP leader’s propensity for opposing, opposing, opposing—even when he initiated and implemented the policy against which he would lead public demonstrations of civil disobedience!

   Prime Minister Stephenson King recently met with the Iyanola Council for the Advancement of Rastafari.
Topping the agenda was the decriminalization of marijuana. Chairman of the Iyanola Council – Aaron Alexander - described the discussions as frank, cordial and fruitful despite both parties having different views on the matter.
Among the outcomes of the meeting was the decision to launch a national debate on the issue. The discussions would be aimed at educating the public on marijuana


while also allowing for debate on the possible decriminalization of the drug. Alexander also believes people arrested for small quantities of marijuana should be released. He added that such a move would help to put an ease on the over-populated Bordelais Correction Facility. He further echoed the sentiments of Former Chief Medical Officer Dr. Stephen King who argued sending an otherwise law abiding citizen to jail for the use of the drug has the potential for devastating side effects.

The Rastafari Council for the Advancement of Rastafari says it is dedicated to continue discussions on the issue.
The information gathered from the discussions, the organization says, will be used to assist the government to chart the way forward on the issue of decriminalization.

   The Saint Lucia Labour Party has listened and observed developments relating to the incident of Friday 1st July involving the assault of a Police Officer by well known UWP operative Gregory “Smoking Joe” Joseph, while the officer was dispensing his duty by placing a parking ticket on a vehicle owned by Castries Central MP, Richard Frederick.
The SLP commends acting Commissioner, Vernon Francois for his reassurance that persons in high places will not dictate how the Police execute their duties and that “Smoking Joe” will be rearrested for his offence. However the SLP believes that the Commissioner has a duty also to remove all doubt from the public mind about what information or motivation would have led a Deputy Commissioner of Police to release a person arrested for, among other things, an assault on a junior police officer working under his command, without a detailed and thorough investigation; particularly when the officer had to be treated for injuries at Victoria Hospital. The Commissioner’s statement that his senior officer was acting on the information which he had at the time is sadly inadequate and tantamount to short-changing the public. The SLP states further that it categorically rejects Richard Frederick’s attempt to suggest that he was not aware that he was in a no parking zone. The SLP contends that Mr. Frederick is the MP for Castries Central; he is a regular on Jeremie Street where the incident took place; he is an ex-police officer and a lawyer by profession so he well knows that his excuse is unacceptable. The SLP calls on Mr. Frederick to explain whether he is also unaware that positioning part of his vehicle on a sidewalk is also a traffic offence.
The SLP notes further that the Castries Central MP suggested that his vehicle may have been a target because of political stickers displayed on it. It is unfortunate that as a member of the Legislature of the Country, Mr. Frederick is always so quick to impute political motive to actions taken by public servants in the execution of their legitimate duties. The public would recall similar accusations levelled by Mr. Frederick against the Comptroller of Customs, in the matter of the seizure of his vehicles by the Customs Department. The SLP hopes that the Police Officer is not dealt with, in the same manner as the Comptroller of Customs.
The SLP believes that this is a matter which demands the intervention of the Prime Minister but the Party holds little hope that Prime Minister King would depart from his customary silence to help lay the public’s mind to rest on this latest disturbing case connected to a member of his Government.